Source: California Invasive Plant Council
URL of this page: http://www.cal-ipc.org/ip/management/ipcw/pages/detailreport.cfm@usernumber=5&surveynumber=182.php
Invasive Plants of California's Wildland
| Ammophila arenaria | |||||
| Scientific name | Ammophila arenaria | ||||
| Additional name information: | (L.) Link | ||||
| Common name | European beachgrass | ||||
| Synonymous scientific names | Arundo arenaria | ||||
| Closely related California natives | 0 | ||||
| Closely related California non-natives: | Ammophila breviligulata | ||||
| Listed | CalEPPC List A-1,CDFA nl | ||||
| By: | Rachel Apteker | ||||
| Distribution |
| ||||
|
HOW DO I RECOGNIZE IT? Distinctive features: |
European beachgrass (Ammophila arenaria) is a perennial rhizomatous grass occurring in coastal dunes. Stems are clumped, stiff, and upright. Leaves are twelve to forty-four inches long, thick and waxy. The outer surface is smooth and light green; the inner surface has ridges and is covered with a whitish coating. Leaves are often rolled at the edges, covering ridges on the inner side, and leaf tips are pointed and sharp. The inflorescence is cylindrical, six to twelve inches long on stiff, erect stems. Rhizomes are tough. Leaves are narrower, stiffer, and lighter in color than the native beachgrass, Leymus mollis. | ||||
| Description: |
|
||||
| WHERE WOULD I FIND IT? |
European beachgrass occurs on sandy coastal dunes from British Columbia to San Diego County, California (Breckon and Barbour 1974, Barbour and Johnson 1977). The plant thrives in unstable dunes where there is continuous sand accretion, but it is also found in stabilized dunes. While European beachgrass appears to spread actively north of San Francisco, it is not as aggressive to the south (Barbour et al. 1976, Barbour and Johnson 1977). However, it is reported as invasive at Guadalupe-Nipomo Dunes in San Luis Obispo County.
| ||||
| WHERE DID IT COME FROM AND HOW IS IT SPREAD? |
European beachgrass is native to the coast of Europe and North
Africa, from Scandinavia south to the Mediterranean Sea, and from Great Britain
east to Egypt. It was first planted along the Pacific Coast of North America,
around San Francisco's Golden Gate Park, in 1869. It has since been transplanted
elsewhere along the coast (Barbour 1970), and there may also have been
subsequent introductions from its native range. It was planted extensively to
stabilize dunes.
| ||||
| WHAT PROBLEMS DOES IT CAUSE? |
European beachgrass forms a dense cover that appears to exclude
many native taxa. Plant species diversity on beaches dominated by European
beachgrass is much less than that of beaches dominated by native beachgrass
(Breckon and Barbour 1974, Barbour et al. 1976, Pavlik 1983c, Boyd 1992). As
European beachgrass cover increases, the cover of native plant species decreases
significantly (Aptekar 1999).
| ||||
| HOW DOES IT GROW AND REPRODUCE? |
European beachgrass primarily reproduces vegetatively
through rhizome growth. Plants are initially established by plantings
undertaken to stabilize dunes, and by rhizomes washing in on ocean
currents from other sites. Once plants are established, they expand their
territory through vigorous rhizome growth. European beachgrass rarely
becomes established by seed. Seedlings are occasionally found, but most
die from desiccation, burial, or erosion. Seedlings are most likely to
survive in dune slacks where the sand surface remains damp (Huiskes 1977,
Benecke 1990).
| ||||
| HOW CAN I GET RID OF IT? |
| ||||
| Physical control: |
Manual methods: European
beachgrass can be removed by intensive repeated digging. Successful manual
control at Lanphere-Christensen Dunes Preserve (Pickart and Sawyer 1998)
required weekly to monthly digging of European beachgrass from early spring
through fall. If sand was "sifted" with rakes to remove rhizome fragments for a
depth of 19.5 to thirty-nine inches (0.5 to 1 m) following digging, follow-up
treatment was not required the following year. If sand was not sifted following
digging, and plots were dug monthly or less frequently, a second year of monthly
digging was required. On foredunes, where European beachgrass grows more
vigorously than in inland stands, a third year of monthly digging was required.
In general, less follow-up digging was required when first-year treatments were
more frequent, more thorough, and/or larger or in less dense locations (so that
fewer plants re-invaded from surrounding
stands).
| ||||
| Biological control: |
Insects and fungi: No
insects or fungi have have been approved by the USDA for control of European
beachgrass in the United States. There is no recorded insect that feeds solely
on European beachgrass. Meromyza pratorum Meigen (Dipt., Chloropidae), a beetle,
feeds only on European beachgrass in western Europe, but it has been found
feeding on wheat in Russia and Italy. The larvae destroy vegetative points,
killing up to 30 to 40 percent of tillers (Huskies 1979). Many fungi have been
recorded as living on European beachgrass, but most of these are non-specific
saprophytes or weak parasites on dying parts of the plant.
| ||||
| Chemical control: |
In experimental trials conducted in northern California from 1991 to 1994, using a variety of herbicides, the only foliar treatment that consistently reduced live European beachgrass cover by 90 percent or more was glyphosate (as Roundup®), applied at concentrations of 4 percent or 10 percent and mixed with 0.5 percent added surfactant (Citowett® or Silwet L-77® were used) applied at 200 gallons per acre (Aptekar 1999). Selective application of 33 percent glyphosate (as Roundup®) applied with a wiper or with an herbicide sprayer had mixed results. In some instances it was extremely effective at reducing European beachgrass cover, but in other instances it had practically no effect. Experimental trials conducted by Monsanto from 1992 to 1994 using Rodeo® (glyphosate without surfactants) have resulted in a label recommendation of 8 percent solution of Rodeo® plus 0.5 to 1.5 percent nonionic surfactant on a spray-to-wet basis, applied during active growth. For selective control, application of 33 percent glyphosate and 1 to 2.5 percent non-ionic surfactant, applied with a wiper to avoid non-target plants, is recommended. The liquid soil fumigant form of metham (as Vapam®) is extremely effective in killing European beachgrass (Aptekar 1999). Applied at label rate, it reduced European beachgrass by 98 to 100 percent, and it was nearly as effective when applied at one-half and one-quarter the label rate. However, there are significant disadvantages to metham. It is difficult to apply and affects all soil organisms. A granular form of the metham, Basimid®, is easy to apply, but is not very effective under dune conditions without sufficient rain or irrigation to move the fumigant to the appropriate soil depth following application, and it also would be detrimental to all soil organisms.
| ||||




