Plant Assessment Form
More Zantedeschia aethiopica resources
Zantedeschia aethiopica
Common Names: calla lily; arum lily
Evaluated on: 7/31/03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation; CalEPPC
P. O. Box 603, Little River, CA 95456-0603
(707) 937-9172; (707) 937-2278
pwarner@mcn.org
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
|
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Documentation | |||
| 1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
| 1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Observational | |
| 1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | U. Unknown | ||
| 1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
| 2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Observational | |
| 2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Observational | |
| 2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | B. Increasing less rapidly | Observational | |
| 2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
| 2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | A. High | Other Published Material | |
| 2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | B. Occasional | Other Published Material | |
| 2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | B. Invades 1 or 2 ecological types | Other Published Material | |
| 3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Observational | |
| 3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
D. Very low | Observational | |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
| Section 1: Impact | |
|---|---|
| Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
|
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: possibly water availability inference from the species invasiveness in wetlands Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6.; |
|
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Observational |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: displaces native wetland species observations Sources of information: Peter Warner |
|
| Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | U |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: probable toxicity to vertebrates inferred from human toxicity from oxalate crystals Sources of information: Russell, AB, JW Hardin, L Grand, and A Fraser. 1997. Poisonous Plants of North Carolina. On-line reference at http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/consumer/poison/Zanteae.htm |
|
| Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
|
none known; no native species closely related inferred from available phylogenetic information Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California |
|
| Section 2: Invasiveness | |
|
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Observational |
|
Describe role of disturbance: little or no apparent human-caused disturbance needed observational _ sites invaded not clearly disturbed; may invade in wetlands with altered nutrient regimes, pH levels, etc. Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
| Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Observational |
|
Describe rate of spread: appears to be increasing, invading into additional wetland habitats at a moderate rate general observation Sources of information: Peter Warner |
|
| Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | B Observational |
|
Describe trend: estimated to be slowly increasing in range and sites invaded; many suitable habitats remain uninfested personal observations; CLIMATE computer-modelling program Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations); |
|
| Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
|
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk website (http://www.hear.org/pier/zaaet.htm); Peter Warner (personal observations) Sources of information: widely sold, propagated, and cultivated commercially; rhizomes dispersed by dumping of garden waste most available information on this taxon is about its horticultural uses; personal observations |
|
| Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | A Other Published Material |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: widely sold, propagated, and cultivated commercially; rhizomes dispersed by dumping of garden waste most available information on this taxon is about its horticultural uses; personal observations Sources of information: numerous horticulturally oriented websites (http://www.geocities.com/RainForest/Vines/7025/calla_lily.html; http://www.mobot.org/gardeninghelp/plantfinder/codea/A475.shtml); Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
| Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | B Other Published Material |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: seeds dispersed by birds written information; also inferred from observations of new populations or those restricted to one or a few plants, these suggesting that plants originated from seed dispersal and not from rhizomes Sources of information: Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk website (http://www.hear.org/pier/zaaet.htm); |
|
| Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | B Other Published Material |
|
Identify other regions: southern Australia wetlands and mesic areas written report Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6 |
|
| Section 3: Distribution | |
| Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | B Observational |
|
invasive in freshwater wetlands written information; observations Sources of information: Randall, RP, and SG Lloyd. 2003. Weed warning from downunder. CalEPPC News 11 (1) 4-6 |
|
| Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | D Observational |
|
Describe distribution: common in north coastal wetlands and seeps, but many such sites not invaded observations Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
| Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
| Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | No |
| Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
| Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
| Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Unknown |
| Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Unknown |
| Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | Yes |
| Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | Yes |
| Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | Yes |
| Total points: | 6 |
| Total unknowns: | 2 |
| Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)| Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
|---|---|---|
| Marine Systems | marine systems | |
| Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
| Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
| estuaries | ||
| Dunes | coastal | |
| desert | ||
| interior | ||
| Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
| coastal scrub | ||
| Sonoran desert scrub | ||
| Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
| Great Basin scrub | ||
| chenopod scrub | ||
| montane dwarf scrub | ||
| Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
| chaparral | D, < 5% | |
| Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | |
| valley and foothill grassland | ||
| Great Basin grassland | ||
| vernal pool | ||
| meadow and seep | ||
| alkali playa | ||
| pebble plain | D, < 5% | |
| Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | D, < 5% |
| marsh and swamp | ||
| Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
| riparian woodland | ||
| riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
| Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
| piñon and juniper woodland | ||
| Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
| Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
| North Coast coniferous forest | ||
| closed cone coniferous forest | ||
| lower montane coniferous forest | ||
| upper montane coniferous forest | ||
| subalpine coniferous forest | ||
| Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
| alpine dwarf scrub | ||
| Amplitude (breadth): | B | |
| Distribution (highest score): | D |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest