Plant Assessment Form
More Ononis alopecuroides resources
Ononis alopecuroides
Common Names: foxtail restharrow
Evaluated on: 1-Aug-03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
UC Davis
Weed Science Program, Robbins Hall, Univ. California, Davis CA 95616
530-754-8715
DiTomaso@vegmail.ucdavis.edu
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Doug Johnson
Joe DiTomaso
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
|
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Documentation | |||
| 1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
| 1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
| 1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | U. Unknown | ||
| 1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Observational | |
| 2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
| 2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | A. Increases rapidly | Other Published Material | |
| 2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | D. Declining | Observational | |
| 2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | Other Published Material | |
| 2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | C. Low | Observational | |
| 2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | C. Rare | Observational | |
| 2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | C. Already invaded | Other Published Material | |
| 3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
B. Moderate | Other Published Material | |
| 3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
D. Very low | Other Published Material | |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
| Section 1: Impact | |
|---|---|
| Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
|
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: Unknown Sources of information: |
|
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
B Other Published Material |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: Forms dense stands that are capable of excluding other vegetation. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
| Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | U |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: Unpalatable to horses and burros. No information on wildlife palatability. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
| Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Observational |
|
Probably none. No other species of Ononis in California. Sources of information: |
|
| Section 2: Invasiveness | |
|
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
A Other Published Material |
|
Describe role of disturbance: Can move into disturbed areas but also expands into adjacent grassland and dry rocky areas. Weed of agricultural areas and disturbed fields. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
| Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | A Other Published Material |
|
Describe rate of spread: Spreads rapidly when established. San Luis Obispo County reported rapid spread with led to Q listing by CDFA. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
| Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | D Observational |
|
Describe trend: Nearly eradicated from state due to County and CDFA control efforts. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; SLO County reports |
|
| Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A Other Published Material |
|
Describe key reproductive characteristics: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) Sources of information: Probably seed contaminant in pasture species, presumably Trifolium seed. |
|
| Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | C Observational |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Probably seed contaminant in pasture species, presumably Trifolium seed. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; SLO County report |
|
| Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | C Observational |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: Does not seem to have a well developed long distance dispersal mechanism. Sources of information: Observational, DiTomaso |
|
| Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | C Other Published Material |
|
Identify other regions: Also weedy in northern and central Europe. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html |
|
| Section 3: Distribution | |
| Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | B Other Published Material |
|
First introduced in about the 1990s. Only found in grasslands and woodland-savannas of San Luis Obispo County. Sources of information: Tu, M. 2002. Ononis alopecuroides. The Nature Conservancy. Weed Alert! http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/alert/alrtonon.html; DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press) |
|
| Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | D Other Published Material |
|
Describe distribution: Very uncommon, close to eradicated. Sources of information: DiTomaso, J.M. and E. A. Healy. 2005. Weeds of California. Div. Nat. Agr. Res. Univ. California (in press); observational by CDFA and SLO County |
|
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
| Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
| Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
| Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
| Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
| Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
| Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Yes |
| Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
| Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
| Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
| Total points: | 7 |
| Total unknowns: | 0 |
| Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)| Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
|---|---|---|
| Marine Systems | marine systems | |
| Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
| Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
| estuaries | ||
| Dunes | coastal | |
| desert | ||
| interior | ||
| Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
| coastal scrub | ||
| Sonoran desert scrub | ||
| Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
| Great Basin scrub | ||
| chenopod scrub | ||
| montane dwarf scrub | ||
| Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
| chaparral | ||
| Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | D, < 5% |
| valley and foothill grassland | ||
| Great Basin grassland | ||
| vernal pool | ||
| meadow and seep | ||
| alkali playa | ||
| pebble plain | ||
| Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | |
| marsh and swamp | ||
| Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | |
| riparian woodland | ||
| riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | D, < 5% | |
| Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
| piñon and juniper woodland | ||
| Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
| Forest | broadleaved upland forest | |
| North Coast coniferous forest | ||
| closed cone coniferous forest | ||
| lower montane coniferous forest | ||
| upper montane coniferous forest | ||
| subalpine coniferous forest | ||
| Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
| alpine dwarf scrub | ||
| Amplitude (breadth): | B | |
| Distribution (highest score): | D |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Central West