Plant Assessment Form
More Digitalis purpurea resources
Digitalis purpurea
Common Names: foxglove
Evaluated on: 7/31/03
List committee review date: 01/08/2003
Re-evaluation date:
Evaluator(s)
California Dept. of Parks and Recreation; CalEPPC
P. O. Box 603, Little River, CA 95456-0603
(707) 937-9176; (707) 937-2278
pwarner@mcn.org
List committee members
Jake SiggPeter Warner
Joe DiTomaso
Doug Johnson
Brianna Richardson
General Comments
No general comments for this species
Table 2. Criteria, Section, and Overall Scores
|
Overall Score?
Limited
|
Alert Status?
No Alert
|
Documentation?
2.5 out of 5
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score | Documentation | |||
| 1.1 | ?Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes | U. Unknown | Reviewed Scientific Publication | |
| 1.2 | ?Impact on plant community | C. Minor | Observational | |
| 1.3 | ?Impact on higher trophic levels | C. Minor | Observational | |
| 1.4 | ?Impact on genetic integrity | D. None | Other Published Material | |
| 2.1 | ?Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment | B. Moderate | Observational | |
| 2.2 | ?Local rate of spread with no management | B. Increases less rapidly | Observational | |
| 2.3 | ?Recent trend in total area infested within state | C. Stable | Observational | |
| 2.4 |
?Innate reproductive potential (see Worksheet A) |
A. High | ||
| 2.5 | ?Potential for human-caused dispersal | A. High | Other Published Material | |
| 2.6 | ? Potential for natural long-distance dispersal | C. Rare | Other Published Material | |
| 2.7 | ?Other regions invaded | B. Invades 1 or 2 ecological types | Other Published Material | |
| 3.1 |
?Ecological amplitude/Range (see Worksheet C) |
A. Widespread | Other Published Material | |
| 3.2 |
?Distribution/Peak frequency (see Worksheet C) |
C. Low | Observational | |
Table 3. Documentation
Scores are explained in the "Criteria for Categorizing Invasive Non-Native Plants that Threaten Wildlands".
| Section 1: Impact | |
|---|---|
| Question 1.1 Impact on abiotic ecosystem processes? | U Reviewed Scientific Publication |
|
Identify ecosystem processes impacted: None known Sources of information: |
|
|
Question 1.2 Impact on plant community composition, structure, and interactions? |
C Observational |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: change in community composition; displacement of native species observed Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation); Joe DiTomaso (personal observation) |
|
| Question 1.3 Impact on higher trophic levels? | C Observational |
|
Identify type of impact or alteration: potential for wildlife poisoning (1) _ have generalist herbivores learned to avoid? Observations suggest plants are not browsed (2) inferred from toxicity of plant; reports on domestic animal injuries, deaths Sources of information: |
|
| Question 1.4 Impact on genetic integrity? | D Other Published Material |
|
None known; probability remote due to lack of closely related native species inferred from lack of closely related species native to California Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California |
|
| Section 2: Invasiveness | |
|
Question 2.1 Role of anthropogenic and natural disturbance in establishment? |
B Observational |
|
Describe role of disturbance: little, if any, disturbance necessary for establishment; grows in shaded to open, damp forests inferred from conditions where plants have become established (observations) Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
| Question 2.2 Local rate of spread with no management? | B Observational |
|
Describe rate of spread: Does not appear to spread rapidly; plants do not generally establish in dense populations based on observations of infestations Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observation) |
|
| Question 2.3 Recent trend in total area infested within state? | C Observational |
|
Describe trend: probably slowly increasing, due to seed dispersal by birds; species has probably been widely dispersed for a long time (100+ years) observational; inference Sources of information: Peter Warner (personal observations) |
|
| Question 2.4 Innate reproductive potential? | A |
|
Describe key reproductive characteristics: abundant production of small seeds (many per flower, many flowers/plant) written information; inference Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California; |
|
| Question 2.5 Potential for human-caused dispersal? | A Other Published Material |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: plants widely used horticulturally; seeds dispersed on clothing, footwear, etc. written information; deductive reasoning based on observations of infested areas Sources of information: DiTomaso, J (unpublished data); |
|
| Question 2.6 Potential for natural long-distance dispersal? | C Other Published Material |
|
Identify dispersal mechanisms: wind, water, mud clinging to animal hooves & feet (1); often observed spreading along trails in damp areas (2) written information Sources of information: 1. DiTomaso, J (unpublished data) |
|
| Question 2.7 Other regions invaded? | B Other Published Material |
|
Identify other regions: widespread in cool, moist areas of the North American west; northeast U. S. published information; observations Sources of information: Hickman, JC, et al. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Vascular Plants of California; |
|
| Section 3: Distribution | |
| Question 3.1 Ecological amplitude/Range? | A Other Published Material |
|
common in cool, coastal forests, woodlands, scrub of Pacific Northwest; unknown types of habitats in Sierra Nevada, Cascades, Klamath Mtns.; probably introduced early in Euro-American settlement areas of the West observations; inference based on horticultural popularity, long-term medicinal use of plant Sources of information: Warner, PJ. 2002-2005. Personal observations, Mendocino Co. 707/937-1976 corylus@earthlink.net |
|
| Question 3.2 Distribution/Peak frequency? | C Observational |
|
Describe distribution: common but sporadic in suitable habitat (1,2,3); not observed in a high proportion of vulnerable habitat types, but common within those invaded (1). extrapolation from local observations Sources of information: 1. Warner, PJ. 2002-2005. Personal observations, Mendocino Co. 707/937-1976 corylus@earthlink.net |
|
Worksheet A - Innate reproductive potential
| Reaches reproductive maturity in 2 years or less | Yes |
| Dense infestations produce >1,000 viable seed per square meter | Yes |
| Populations of this species produce seeds every year. | Yes |
| Seed production sustained over 3 or more months within a population annually | No |
| Seeds remain viable in soil for three or more years | Yes |
| Viable seed produced with both self-pollination and cross-pollination | Yes |
| Has quickly spreading vegetative structures (rhizomes, roots, etc.) that may root at nodes | No |
| Fragments easily and fragments can become established elsewhere | No |
| Resprouts readily when cut, grazed, or burned | No |
| Total points: | 7 |
| Total unknowns: | 0 |
| Total score: | A? |
Related traits:
Worksheet B - Arizona Ecological Types is not included here
Worksheet C - California Ecological Types
(sensu Holland 1986)| Major Ecological Types | Minor Ecological Types | Code? |
|---|---|---|
| Marine Systems | marine systems | |
| Freshwater and Estuarine | lakes, ponds, reservoirs | |
| Aquatic Systems | rivers, streams, canals | |
| estuaries | ||
| Dunes | coastal | |
| desert | ||
| interior | ||
| Scrub and Chaparral | coastal bluff scrub | |
| coastal scrub | D, < 5% | |
| Sonoran desert scrub | ||
| Mojavean desert scrub (incl. Joshua tree woodland) | ||
| Great Basin scrub | ||
| chenopod scrub | ||
| montane dwarf scrub | ||
| Upper Sonoran subshrub scrub | ||
| chaparral | D, < 5% | |
| Grasslands, Vernal Pools, Meadows, and other Herb Communities | coastal prairie | |
| valley and foothill grassland | ||
| Great Basin grassland | ||
| vernal pool | D, < 5% | |
| meadow and seep | ||
| alkali playa | ||
| pebble plain | D, < 5% | |
| Bog and Marsh | bog and fen | D, < 5% |
| marsh and swamp | D, < 5% | |
| Riparian and Bottomland habitat | riparian forest | D, < 5% |
| riparian woodland | ||
| riparian scrub (incl.desert washes) | ||
| Woodland | cismontane woodland | |
| piñon and juniper woodland | ||
| Sonoran thorn woodland | ||
| Forest | broadleaved upland forest | C, 5% - 20% |
| North Coast coniferous forest | ||
| closed cone coniferous forest | ||
| lower montane coniferous forest | ||
| upper montane coniferous forest | ||
| subalpine coniferous forest | ||
| Alpine Habitats | alpine boulder and rock field | |
| alpine dwarf scrub | ||
| Amplitude (breadth): | A | |
| Distribution (highest score): | C |
Infested Jepson Regions
Click here for a map of Jepson regions
- Cascade Range
- Central West
- Great Valley
- Northwest
- Sierra Nevada
- Southwest